Categories
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
Blogroll
Useful Sites
Friendly Links!
(Add your link here!)Tags
Search Marketing Success Stories
03/09/10
Posted by RobOusbey
Search Engine Optimization covers a huge range of tactics – all of which can bring direct benefit to a website. In this post, I’ve shared examples of different tactics used at different websites, and the effects that have been seen. If you’re considering an SEO campaign for your site, or are trying to persuade someone else to invest in internet marketing, I hope this post will help demonstrate the potential of internet marketing.
The post includes real screen shots from Google Analytics (click any of them to enlarge) but the sites and data have been anonymized.
Target Your Target Terms
Remember that post about building a page with perfect keyword targeting? SEOmoz wasn’t kidding around.
A website that sells homewares had issues with site structure and on-page targeting. Their category level pages were at subdomains such as
- http://kitchenequipment.sitename.com
or
- http://livingrooms.sitename.com
whilst each sub-category was back on the main subdomain at:
- www.sitename.com/find_product2.asp?url1=living+room&url2=rugs+and+carpets
Category and sub-category pages had a distinct lack of semantic HTML or term targeting.
Getting appropriate H1 tags onto each page was a quick job, improving title tag structure took a bit longer, clean & friendly URLs and internal links with appropriate anchor text were also added.
The site saw ranking improvements across the board, which brought new traffic through head, mid and long tail terms. Can you guess when the changes were made?
Getting sorted in Google Local
Before getting into the nitty-gritty of ranking factors for Local Search, dead simple tactics, etc, it’s important to get the basics right. A large chain of restaurants created a ‘bulk upload’ file with the correct data for each one of their locations. After uploading the file, they applied for it to be reviewed and ‘whitelisted’. Local data that’s been uploaded by the business owner and whitelisted is treated as authoritatively as locations that have been manually verified by postcard.
Despite various issues (Google’s best practice guidelines still aren’t quite the best solution in some cases) the traffic generated by visibility in Local Search has been significant and valuable. (The uploads were verified in late November when the traffic begins its steady rise.)
Architecture of Change
A current affairs magazine wanted to get more from their website. Because of falling advertising revenue, the publication was at risk of being closed down. They’d seen some growth from SEO already, but wanted to prove that the website had greater value.
Although the site had a good brand and some great content, it suffered from similar problems to many news-type websites, including badly archived content, duplicate issues and a CMS that hampered keyword targeting or promoting individual articles. Recommendations were made to improve the site’s architecture and migrate to the new structure.
The effect of the changes was immediate growth which took the organic traffic to 257% in three months. A month later, the magazine’s owner explained that the falling revenue from print advertising meant that they couldn’t continue to lose money publishing the mag, and closed it down.
Hook, Line, Sinker
An office cleaning company wanted to improve the profile of their site through SEO. Amongst other tactics, a member of staff spent a day writing a ‘linkbait’ post to publish on their blog. This generated huge amounts of traffic from social media sites (dwarfing their regular daily visitors) and was subsequently linked to from dozens of sites. This post, along with other content published on the site to attract links, helped the site grow in strength and authority, and it now ranks position 3 for ‘office cleaning’ in their country.
Paid In Full
This is SEOmoz, but I’d like to share a graph from a PPC colleague working on a site that sells scooters. They were initially bidding on very broad terms (scooter, scooters, buy a scooter, etc) but the campaign was adjusted to target more long tail terms, including descriptions, specifications, etc.
Over a period of around six weeks, the cost per click was reduced by 30% and the more targeted traffic converted increasingly well – this allowed the site owners to increase their ad budget and generated more sales than their paid search campaign ever had before.
If you’re new to SEOmoz and this post has inspired you to get involved in search marketing for your site, do browse the site for the PRO & free SEO guides and the SEO blog. If you’re a regular, do share any stories you’re particularly proud of in the comments.
Posted by jennita
SMX West 2010 kicked off with quite a bang (or was that a yell?). Since Microsoft’s CEO, Steve Ballmer was the keynote, people arrived early to ensure good seats. The music playing before it started was amazing, it helped to create an excitement in the room that I really had never felt before a keynote before. I had attempted to save a seat for someone up front, but there was just too much demand and had to give it up. That’s the sort of thing that happens at a great concert, not a conference keynote.
There were quite a few live blogs of the event, but I had a few favorites from the interview that I wanted to call out.
- He made it very clear that Microsoft is focused on the big picture and not just immediate goals. He spoke about continuing to move forward with a positive momentum and a differentiated point of view.
- When the question came up of "Can you be #1 in the U.S.?" he essentially said "YES!" [and yes he said it with that exclamation] However he made it clear that it was a tricky question. If you say yes, you sound arrogant but if you say no you sound unsure of yourself. You don’t do things to come in second!
- Danny asked "Is Yahoo! going to survive as a search player? You want to beat them aren’t you just going to kill them?" Ballmer could really only answer one way "No." He stated that they wanted Yahoo! to do a good job, that there was lots of flexibility written into their contract and there was advantage to having the power of 2 as opposed to the power of 1.
- When asked whether he was going to get on Twitter he said "I’m more of a webpage than a bunch of short tweets." But then acknowledged that he did have a stealth Twitter account however only the people in his neighborhood followed him.
- His favorite thing on Bing are the Bing maps. [completely agree here... the maps are amazing!]
- What he thinks is the biggest opportunity in search: to "Help people get done what they’re trying to get done."
- Oh! And he gave us all his personal email account. You’ll have to watch the video to get that though.
All in all it was quite enjoyable to watch, although I was a bit unprepared (although perhaps I shouldn’t have been) for the yelling. Ok, I don’t think in his mind he was yelling, he was just talking VERY LOUDLY. But sitting right up front, I think we all sat back in our chairs a bit when he got excited and started to get louder.
You can see the full video of the keynote below.
<br/><a href="http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/steve-ballmer-smx-west-keynote-conversation-with-danny-sullivan/1280gxwnj?fg=sharenoembed" _fcksavedurl="http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/steve-ballmer-smx-west-keynote-conversation-with-danny-sullivan/1280gxwnj?fg=sharenoembed" target="_new"title="Steve Ballmer SMX West Keynote Conversation with Danny Sullivan">Video: Steve Ballmer SMX West Keynote Conversation with Danny Sullivan</a>
Google’s Personalized Search Revolution
Now that personalization has become an opt-out rather than an opt-in, I was really interested in what this session had to offer. The only speaker, Brian Horling who works in Personalized Search at Google, first gave a very informative presentation, then fielded quite a few questions from the audience. I really enjoyed having just one speaker who was focused on the topic at hand. The top takeaways that I got were some of the differences between a logged out user who gets personalized search versus a logged in user. Let me break it down a bit.
First of all, both types of users are thought of as two different identities to Google. Let’s say you’re logged in, and then log out, they don’t view you as the same logged in person. At that point they do look at the cookies set on your computer which tell gives them information on what you’ve searched for previously, which results you’ve clicked on, etc. For signed in accounts, your web history is saved indefinitely, but your non-logged in identity is only saved for 180 days.
Every user using search has the potential of seeing personalized search in some way whether it’s geo-location, web history, social search, etc. Personalization occurs about 1 in 5 queries for a user and the changes tend to be restricted to only a few results.
How can you control the personalization of your searches?
- Use search details
- Disable it by appending &pws=0 on searchs (you can find the bookmarklet to do that here)
- Edit or disable your web history
If you haven’t looked at the "view customizations" link I highlight above before, you should definitely check it out. Pretty interesting what’s going on there.
One thing that came up in this session was how do you explain to a client that the results they’re seeing aren’t the same as what everyone else sees. Although in some cases that would probably be a good thing since they’re seeing better rankings since they search and click on their sites more often than the average user.
How do you feel about personalized search? After this presentation I found that I was much more open to the idea than I was previously. I think because I felt like I finally understood a bit better where the data was coming from and how to turn it off. But what about you?
And so on…
The other session I really loved was "Supercharging Your Descriptions With Sitelinks" but as I was putting this post together I realized that should really a be a post in and of itself. It was great to hear from a Google rep about how certain sitelinks show up and ways you can enhance your site to ensure proper sitelinks. I have tons of screenshots and examples, so I’ll put them into a full post. Plus I’d really like to get Jerry Dischler (the Google guy) to answer a few of my questions.
So watch for that one!
The best swag of the conference goes to Yahoo! for not only giving away these awesome coffee mugs, but for setting up a full-on coffee shop with baristas to make us our much needed lattes!
I really wanted to show the videos from the SMX Ignite as that was one of my favorite parts of the day. But unfortunately the videos aren’t live yet. Here’s a link to where they should be.
Maile Ohye’s "DateRank: PageRank for singles" was my personal favorite, although all the speakers were exceptional.
Dana Lookadoo and I interviewed a number of people in sort of a Jay Leno "man on the street" sort of way. We hope to have the interviews up tomorrow.
Posted by randfish
We’ve been getting a lot of questions in Q+A and on the road at events like last week’s Miva Merchant conference, Online Marketing Summit and the YCombinator conference about how to properly paginate results for search engines. In this post, we’ll cover the dangers, opportunities and optimization tactics that can best ensure success. The best part? These practices aren’t just good for SEO, they’re great for usability and user experience too!
Why is Pagination an SEO Issue?
Pagination, the practice of segmenting links to content on multiple pages, affects two critical elements of search engine accessibility.
- Crawl Depth: Best practices demand that the search engine spiders reach content-rich pages in as few "clicks" as possible (turns out, users like this, too). This also impacts calculations like Google’s PageRank (or Bing’s StaticRank), which determine the raw popularity of a URL and are an element of the overall algorithmic ranking system.
- Duplicate Content: Search engines take duplication very seriously and attempt to show only a single URL that contains any given piece of content. When pagination is implemented improperly, it can cause duplicate content problems, both for individual articles and the landing pages that allow browsing access to them.
When is Pagination Necessary?
When a site grows beyond a few dozen pages of content in a specific category or subcategory, listing all of the links on a single page of results can make for unwieldly, hard-to-use pages that seem to scroll indefinitely (and can cause long load times as well).

Clearly, I need to log into Facebook more often…
But, usability isn’t the only reason pagination exists. For many years, Google’s recommended that pages contain no more than 100 links (internal or external) in order to make it easy for spiders to reach down deep into a site’s architecture. Many SEOs have found that this "limit" isn’t hard and fast, but staying within that general range remains a best practice. Hence, pages that contain many hundreds or thousands of links may inadvertently be hurting the access of search engines to the content-rich pages in the list making pagination essential.
Numbers of Links & Pages
We know that sometimes pagination is essential – one page of results just doesn’t cut it in every situation. But just how many links to content should the average category/results page show? And how many pages of results should display in the pagination?
.gif)
There are a lot of options here, but there’s serious danger in using the wrong structures. Let’s take a look at the right (and wrong) ways to determine link numbers.
.gif)
.gif)

In some cases, there’s simply too many pages of results to list them all. When this happens, the very best thing you can do is to work around the problem by… creating more subcategories! It may seem challenging or even counter-intuitive, but adding either an extra layer of classification or a greater number of subcategories can have a dramatically positive impact on both SEO and usability.


There are times, however, when even the creation of many deep subcategories isn’t enough. If your site is big enough, you may need to have extensive pagination such that not every page of results can be reached in once click. In these cases, there are a few clear dos and don’ts.
Do:
- Try to link to as many pages of the pagination structure as possible without breaking the 100(ish) links per page limit
- Show newer content at the top of the results list when possible, as this means the most link juice will flow to newer articles that need it (and are temporally relevant)
- Use and link to relevant/related categories & subcategories to help keep link juice flowing throughout the site
- Link back to the top results from each of the paginated URLs
.gif)
Don’t:
- Show only a few surrounding paginated links from paginated URLs – you want the engines to be able to crawl deeper from inside the structure
- Link to only the pages at the front and end of the paginated listings; this will flow all the juice to the start and end of results, ingoring the middle
- Try to randomize the paginated results shown in an effort to distribute link juice; you want a static site architecture the engines can crawl
- Try to use AJAX to get deeper in the results sets – engines follow small snippets of Javascript (sometimes), but they’re not at a point where this is an SEO best practice
- Go over the top trying to get every paginated result linked-to, as this can appear both spammy and unusably ugly
When in doubt, consider the directives you’re optimizing toward – the need for fewer extra pages of pagination, the desire to make the browsing experience usable (many webmasters mistakenly think users will simply give up and search, forgetting that some of us can’t recall the name of the piece we’re looking for!) and the importance of maintaining a reasonable count of links per page. Also note that although I’ve illustrated using 5-10 listings (for graphical space requirements), a normal listings set could be 30-90 links per page, depending on the situation.
Titles & Meta Descriptions for Paginated Results
In most cases, the title and meta description of paginated results are copied from the top page. This isn’t ideal, as it can potentially cause duplicate content issues. Instead, you can employ a number of tactics to help solve the problem.
Example of results page titles & descriptions:
Top Page Title: Theatres & Playhouses in Princeton, New Jersey
Top Page Meta Description: Listings of 368 theatres, playhouses and performance venues in the Princeton, NJ region (including surrounding cities).Page 4 Title: Page 4 of 7 for Princeton, New Jersey Theatres & Playhouses
Page 4 Meta Description: Listings 201-250 (out of 368) theatres, playhouses and performance venues in the Princeton, NJ region (inclusing surrounding cities).Alternate Page 4 Title: Results Page 4/7 for Princeton, New Jersey Theatres & Playhouses
Alternate Page 4: Description: -
Yes, you can use no meta description at all, and in fact, if I were setting up a CMS today, this is how I’d do it. A missing meta description reduces complexity and potential mis-casting of URLs as duplicates. Also notce that I’ve made the titles on results pages sub-optimal to help dissuade the engines from sending traffic to these URLs, rather than the top page (which is made to be the better "landing" experience for users).
Nofollows. Rel=Canonicals and Conditional Redirects
Some SEOs and website owners have, unfortunately, received or interpreted advice incorrectly about employing directives like the nofollow tag, canonical URL tag or even conditional redirects to help control bot activity in relation to pagination. These are almost always a bad idea.
Whatever you do, DO NOT:
- Put a rel=canonical directive on paginated results pointing back to the top page in an attempt to flow link juice to that URL. You’ll either misdirect the engines into thinking you have only a single page of results or convince them that your directives aren’t worth following (as they find clearly unique content on those pages).
- Add nofollow to the paginated links on the results pages. This tells the engines not to flow link juice/votes/authority down into the results pages that desperately need those votes to help them get indexed and pass value to the deeper pages.
- Create a conditional redirect so that when search engines request paginated results, they 301 redirect or meta refresh back to the top page of results.
The only time I recommend using any of these is when pagination exists in multiple formats. For example, if you let users re-sort by a number of different metrics (in a restaurant list, for example, it might be by star rating, distance, name, price, etc.), you may want to either perform this re-sort using javascript (and employ the hash tag in the URL) or make those separately segmented paginated results rel=canonical back to a single sorting format.
Letting Users Display More/Less Results
From a usability perspective, this can make good sense, allowing users with faster connections or a greater desire to browse large numbers of results at once to achieve these goals. However, it can cause big duplicate problems for search engines, and add complexity and useless pages to the engines’ indices. If/when you create these systems, employ javascript/AJAX (either with or without the hash tag) to make the pages reload without creating a separate URL.

(the Google Analytics interface allows users to choose the number of rows shown, though they don’t have to worry much about crawlability or search-friendliness)
Also remember that the "default" number of results shown is what the search engines will see; so make that count match your goals for usability and SEO.
Additional Resources
- A Gallery of Pagination Examples and Recommendations from Smashing Magazine
- A Farewell to Pagination from SEOmoz’s Whiteboard Friday series
- The SEO Pager Plugin for Wordpress is a highly customizable set of options that allows you to create search-engine friendly pagination in Wordpress’s CMS from SEO Egghead
If you have any thoughts or recommendations to share in the comments, we’d love to hear from you!
I recently was chatting with a new blogger and they made the comment that after 3 weeks of blogging that they’d run out of things to write about. They had written 10 posts so far but felt that they’d nothing else to share of value on the topic.
What surprised me about their comments was that the blogger was actually a seasoned pro in their niche. They were new to blogging about their topic but they’d been working in their industry for 25 years and were seen as an expert in their field…. yet they didn’t feel like they had anything to say about the topic!
I dug a little deeper and it turned out that the reason for their issue was not that they didn’t have much to write about – but that they were taking for granted the level of knowledge that they actually had. Much of what they’d learned over the years was now so basic to them that they didn’t realise how valuable it was for someone at a lower level of expertise.
To use an old cliche – they were the type of person who has forgotten what most of us will ever know about their topic.
He said to me at one point – ‘I just want every post I write to be something that cuts new ground – something that says something great that no one has ever thought before.’
I’ve felt this way myself over the years (and still do). For me it often came about in those nervous moments before I’d go on stage to present about blogging. Doubts would creep in….”what do I know?”…. “my presentation is too basic”….. “what if people are too advanced for this?”….
The reality is though that 99% of people in the audiences I spoke to had a such basic understanding of my topic that what I often thought was basic was often a stretch for them.
Often in the Q&A times at the end of such presentations I’d realise to myself just how much I actually did know about my topic and how often in the search for my next profound post that unlocked the secrets to the universe that I was actually over looking a treasure trove of more basic but just as helpful topics.
I’m not suggesting that every post you write needs to rehash the basics of your topic – however I guess this is simple a challenge for those of us who sometimes struggle to feel we’ve got anything helpful and worthwhile to say to realize that we might be over thinking things and could probably serve our readers better by examining what we do know and sharing that.
Sidenote: I was having a discussion that touched on this today at Third Tribe when Valeria Maltoni commented – ‘I also take what I know for granted a lot.‘
I responded to her with:
“I think most of us have stuff in our head that we think is too basic to share with others however it’s real GOLD when we do share it because it’s often things that others are thinking about asking but are too scared – or its something that they need to know but don’t really know that they need it.“
How does one get to those Basic but Golden things?
A few ides for posts come to mind:
- Describe an experience that you’ve had
- Share a problem that you overcame and how you did it
- Give an example of where you learned an important lesson
- Tell the story of how you taught someone something
- Remember what it was like to be a beginner in your topic and outline the things you wish you’d known
- Share the answers to some questions that you or someone else once had
Post from: Blog Tips at ProBlogger.
What Are You Taking For Granted That Might Be Useful to Others?
Meet the Mozzers!
02/25/10
Posted by jennita
Over the past few months, we’ve announced a number of exciting changes here at the mozPlex. Some of those include becoming focused on our software, new SEO tools and a cultural change with our TAGFEE Tenets. With that, we’re committed to being transparent and authentic and feel we’ve done a great job keeping the SEOmoz community up to date on many of these changes.

However, one area we’ve been slacking is in ensuring that our community knows who we are, as a team. There are many mozzers who mainly work behind the scenes building tools, or providing excellent customer service to our members. Along with our shift from consulting, we’ve had a few organizational changes and people’s roles have changed. Additionally we have a number of moz Associates that help contribute to the blog and provide expertise in Q & A.
We’d like to take this opportunity to introduce you to our team, and ask you to get to know us a little better. There are a few new mozzers that may even surprise you! This is an exciting time for us and the community and we’re excited to introduce ourselves. Each mozzer was asked to provide their title, social media accounts, top moz moment (tools created, blog posts written, etc.), then I asked them to answer a few fun questions. So without further ado, I’d like you to meet the mozzers.
Development Team
Every team plays an important role to the success of SEOmoz and our tools, but the development team is key. Without this group we wouldn’t have the suite of amazing tools that we have to offer our members today. Browse through the developers and see who has worked on your favorite tool, and learn more about the people behind the scenes.
Ben Hendrickson Sr Software Engineer "From the day I started building the Linkscape prototype to the day we launched the first version was about 10 months. I think that project went well." |
Chas WilliamsSoftware Developer "I work mostly on Linkscape these days. I wrote the code for anchor text distributions and the new views for OSE, so the OSE launch was a proud moment for me
|
David Joslin Systems Engineer "Since starting in August I have worked to improve our uptime significantly through monitoring, tuning, and application fixes. " |
Jeff Pollard Lead Web Developer "I make sure your website experience is a wonderful one!
|
Kate Matsudaira VP Engineering "Helping bring SEO tools and technology to the next level" |
Ken Woodruff![]() Senior Architect |
Nick Gerner Senior Engineer Nick Leads SEOmoz API development and is currently working on solutions for historical Linkscape data tracking. |
Phil Smith Developer "Working on sooper-top secret project"
|
Roger Mozbot Needs No Title Standing on a crate in order to be as tall as Googlebot.
|
Marketing Team
Now that we are focused on our SEO tools, the consulting and marketing teams have been combined. There have been a number of changes in roles and we’re now more focused than ever on getting our products launched, participating and leading our amazing community, and creating excellent content for our readers. Take a peak at our new Marketing team!
Danny Dover SEO Specialist Danny is at least half full of SEO know-how |
Jen Sable Lopez Community Director Having worked remotely for 9 months, I LOVE being in the office.
|
Joanna Lord Director of Customer Acquisition & Engagement "My focus is on introducing new audiences to our awesome resources and SEO tools. " |
Scott Willoughby Director-Conversion & Retention Marketing |
Product Team
The product team leads the path to ensuring that the products being built meet the needs of our customers and they manage the projects from inception through deployment. Essentially they make sure we’re all doing our jobs.
Adam FeldsteinDirector of Product Management Current Focus: 1) Ship a new version of the mozBar. 2) Something much bigger (that I can’t talk about yet) |
Ben Huff Product Manager "I focus on herding cats. Recently that included getting Open Site Explorer out the door, safe and sound. I’m currently working on doing the same for the new Keyword Difficulty tool." |
Matt HeilmanArt Director "I make SEOmoz look good"
|
Operations Team
Who keeps the company working like a well oiled machine? That’s the Operations team of course! They jump in and help with any aspect of the company as needed and are often our customers first point of contact. Without their magic touch the office would be running around like chickens with their heads cut off. Thanks for keeping us from running into each other!
Arden TurnbullCustomer Service Manager / Office Coordinator Arden keeps our customers happy! |
Christine V.![]() Director of Operations I do my best to increase the staff’s level of happiness and productiveness, much like Tattoo on Fantasy Island. |
Sarah Bird Chief Operations Officer I own legal, financial, HR, and generally help make everything run smoothly. I also champion the Marketing Department and the SEOmoz API. I love my job. |
moz Associates
This is an amazing group of experts from across the search marketing industry. We’re priveledged to have this group contributing to the blog, helping with Q & A and providing insight for new products. It sorta feels like we’re showing off… because we totally are!
Cindy Krum![]() CEO & founder of Rank-Mobile – Denver, CO |
Duncan Morris Founder and CEO, Distilled – London, UK |
Jane Copland SEO Consultant, Ayima Search Marketing – London, England "I’ve written a couple of successful blog posts for SEOmoz (I worked as a full-time employee at SEOmoz from 2006 until 2009). My favourites are: Don’t End URLs in .0, What Rand and Jane Write When They’re Drunk, the follow-up and A True Story. It’s about hookers." |
Kate Morris Kate Morris, Search Engine Marketing Consultant – Austin, TX "My favorite blog post on YouMoz was Paid Search: Detaching From an Agency, which is what got me speaking on my first panel at SMX East 2008." |
Lindsay Wassell Q & A – Tampa Bay, FL |
Michael Cottam Principal, Michael Cottam SEO Consulting – Portland, OR, Canada I like this one, and it seemed to generate a pile o’ comments: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/its-a-feeding-frenzy-for-keywordrich-domains |
Peter Meyers President, User Effect – Chicago, IL The post: SEO Cheat Sheet: Anatomy of a URL My most popular post on my own blog (by a longshot) is 25 Point Website Usability Checklist. |
Richard Baxter Director / Founder SEOgadget.co.uk - London, UK Hmm. I like writing about tools you guys do – Like this and this and pretty charts on ranking factors using Linkscape data like this. And I really like talking about Microformats. |
Rob Ousbey Search Marketing Consultant, Distilled – Seattle, WA (soon to be) |
Sam Crocker SEO Consultant, Distilled – London, for now! I’m pretty new to the moz crew but I was pretty pleased with manning up to take on a "doozy" for my first Q & A and think I found a good solution to the problem |
Tom Critchlow Head of Search Marketing, Distilled – London Baby. My most loved SEOmoz post was this one, mainly because of it’s sensationalist headline… Headlines ftw. My proudest SEOmoz contribution was speaking at both the Seattle and London pro seminars in 2009 and getting some really positive feedback and comments. |
Will Critchlow Co-Founder of Distilled, UK & US – London, UK. Though anywhere rainy appears to do. Taking credit for lots of things done by our team, I’m probably most proud of the London PRO seminar in October last year. My personal favourite post, mainly for the title (just google "space monstering") is this one. |
Boss Team
Last, but definitely not least we have our co-founders Rand and Gillian. They may very well be the most well known of the bunch, but I bet you didn’t know Rand used to be a black market Pokemon dealer! Without these two, we wouldn’t be the team we are today.
Gillian Muessig President/Co-Founder "I’m the corporate evangelist and international voice for SEOmoz. My role is to connect the the SEOmoz community with the SEOmoz team and to spread the SEOmoz brand to new audiences and markets." |
Rand Fishkin CEO |
Thanks for taking the time to get to know us!

Posted by randfish
Last week, while in London, I received an email from Paul Graham, whom I’ve long admired, possibly even idolized a bit. He asked if I was available to come speak at a YCombinator SEO event in Mountain View. Tonight, I presented at that evented and thought I’d share my experiences, recommendations and yes, my presentation. Not everything that was discussed is public, in fact, much of it is "classified" at YC’s request. However, there’s so much good material that it would be criminal not to share.
First up, my presentation from the YCombinator SEO for Startups event (naturally, hosted on YC company and prior SEOmoz consulting client, Scribd):
SEO for Startups: YCombinator February 2010
Next, since it’s hard to do any slide deck justice with just the slides, a list of top advice and recommendations, not just from the slide deck, but from many years of interactions, consulting and Q+A help for startups:
- SEO as a Strategy, not a Tactic
Yelp uses SEO as a strategy. When their community finds something new in the neighborhood, content is created. They are limited in scale only by the physical world’s local businesses. Plus, it’s only natural that local businesses with good rankings will want to share those via a badge and a link; it’s only natural that their top contributors will want to share the reviews they’ve given. SEO is a strategy – it’s part of what makes them the business they are. If you’re just thinking in terms of keywords in the title and submitting to some directories, you’re going to get lapped by someone who understands how to make content, links, sharing & search demand an integral part of how users interact with their website. - Start SEO in the Concept Phase, Not After the Site is Built
It’s hard to do, particularly when you spend your first two years as a founder thinking SEO is a cross between black magic and BS, but SEO works best when it’s architected alongside a businesses marketing plan. I’ve mentioned in the past that I think VCs and angel investors should be asking about SEO in the first meeting – startups should be three steps ahead of that. - Build Accessibility First & Foremost
I come back time and time again to the SEO Pyramid. It all starts with unique content that engines can find and users find valuable. I’m now the proud owner of a Y Combinator t-shirt bearing the tagline "Make Something People Want." All I’m asking is that you also make something Google (and Bing) can find, too. And, in concert with this advice, check out Perfecting Keyword Targeting & On-Page Optimization to help solve that puzzle. - SEO is NOT a One Time Event
Fire and forget works with smartbombs (or maybe not – scroll to section 5), but it doesn’t work with SEO. This is a constantly evolving field, and not so much because Google’s algorithm is changing all the time, but more so because 300 (or 30,000) competitors are constantly trying to produce better content and market it more effectively while the engines are constantly experimenting with new kinds of results and information. No product is good enough to survive without marketing – even Google itself just ran a Super Bowl ad. SEO is marketing, and as such demands the same attention. Ignore it, and you will fall by the wayside. - Analytics are a Religion
An ad salesman comes to you and tells you that 20% of your exact target market is reading a particular magazine. By putting in a full-page ad every month for the next year, you can ensure that they’ll all know your name and many will buy from you. But wait… How many saw it? How many took the desired action? How many heard about it from a friend or read a loaner copy on a flight? You’ll never know. With SEO, it’s the complete opposite – every action has a trackable reaction. If you ignore the data, use last-touch attribution or neglect to build serious models that track the value of your campaigns, you may as well blow the money on a giant billboard on the 101. Who knows? Maybe the right investor will drive by and decide to invest… Just don’t count on it. - Clever Tricks Aren’t that Clever (or New)
I promise that no hairbrained scheme to manipulate the search rankings by registering thousands of sites or scraping the web for open places to link or contacting 6,000 "friends" for a link exchange are either A) new or B) going to work. Apply your creativity in white hat ways and make sure it passes the Google web spam litmus test. And no, that doesn’t just mean it passes Google’s Quality Guidelines, it means you would happily show it to any engineer on the webspam team content in the knowledge that they’d actually WANT it to help your site rank better. - Don’t Let Search Dominate Your Traffic Sources
If Google sends 90% of your traffic, your business has real danger associated with it. Why aren’t people coming directly to your site, being passed links in email, getting Tweets and Facebook mentions that send traffic? Why is no one blogging about you, writing about you in the press, commenting in forums with links to your content? These "natural" signs tell a story of a real business providing real value. The 90-95% Google trafficked site says something strange is going on, and Google themselves are likely to figure that out sooner or later.
And last, but not least, I’d like to recognize some of the brilliant people and companies represented. It was humbling to receive such kind praise and attentitive ears from companies like:
- Apartment Rentals Site – AirBnB (whose founders were kind enough to give me a ride back to my hotel at SFO!)
- Dead Simple Publishing Site – Posterous (I learned the official way to pronounce it – "pastarus")
- Concerts & Tour Dates Startup – Songkick
- Time Management Software Provider – RescueTime ( a local Seattle startup, and host of the Feb. 25 event)
- Gift Card Exchange Marketplace – Cardpool
- Real Time Search Startup – Scoopler
- Live Video & Chat Hub – Justin.tv
Tragically, the following brief set of photos from the event were taken on my new Android camera phone (yes, I’m such a Hacker News/Paul Graham geek that I had to pull it out):

YCombinator Founders Eating Dinner (noticeably absent in the photo was the single female founder – but they do have one!)

Luckily, there was plenty of Coke to help keep me hydrated (and caffeinated) during the event

The rush for pizza (apparently, The Flash is one of the founders they funded!)

Paul and Rand in the Anybots lab – thanks again, Paul; it was a fantastic experience
There were more than 40 companies in attendance, so there’s no way to name them all here, but the above represent some of the most active on the SEO panel and during the lengthy, but phenomenal Q+A. Later this week, SEOmoz’s own Danny Dover will be attending the Y Combinator meetup in Seattle, and he’d love to say hi and chat with folks there, and hopefully help to bring a good name to SEO.
p.s. At the end of the presentation, Paul noted that the startups owed me a debt for sharing information about SEO. I disagree, but who am I to pass up such a wonderful opportunity. My only request to the attendees was that, if they should see SEO being badmouthed on Hacker News to kindly step in and help others realize the power and legitimacy of this marketing channel.
Is Google Getting Too Personal?
02/17/10
Posted by Dr. Pete
Late last year, Google announced that they would be rolling out personalized search even for visitors who weren’t logged into a Google account. There’s been a lot of talk in the SEO community about how this affects the already dubious future of rankings, but it seems to boil down to one simple fear: does my client (or boss) see the same rankings that I do? I decided to put this to the test – take one client’s real-world keywords and see how much rankings changed depending on how I measured them.
Experiment I – 4 Keywords, 5 Methods
In Experiment I, I took 4 of my client’s most sought after keyphrases (from a popular 1-word query to a long-tail 4-word query) and measured rankings for a week using 5 different methods:
- Default – Standard, logged-in query
- PWS=0 – Adding the &pws=0 query parameter
- Logged out – Standard query, but logged out of Google
- Rank Tracker – Data from SEOmoz’s Rank Tracker tool
- GWT – Data from Google Webmaster Tools
Google Webmaster Tools data was only measured once, after the fact, using the "Last 7 Days" option. All queries were limited to web search on Google.com (US). The mean ranking for each keyword by method appears below:
Practically speaking, rankings for this particular set of keywords didn’t vary much across methods. Keyword 1 tends to bounce between the #1 and #2 spot, which the Logged out ranking showed, and there was some disagreement about Keyword 3, but the differences were mild at best. All methods correlated strongly with the default search (r = 0.97 to r = 1.00).
Experiment II – 20 Keywords, 6 Methods
Of course, this was one set of data and only 4 keywords/phrases, so I figured I should up the ante. I pulled the Top 20 search queries (by impressions) from Google Webmaster Tools and did a second round of one-day measurements. I also added a 6th method, "Caribou". No, it’s not a secret codename – I took the laptop to Caribou Coffee to pull a new IP and tried a logged out search from there. Experiment II’s numbers turned out a bit more interesting:
This one takes a bit of explaining. Graphing 20 keywords x 6 methods is ugly at best, so Figure II shows the number of times each method’s ranking varied from default across 5 levels, from ±0 (same ranking) to ±4 spots. The PWS=0 and Logged out groups showed the least variation from default searches, with the Rank Tracker, GWT, and Caribou groups showing more variation (especially at ranking differences of 1-2 spots). Correlations ranged from a perfect 1.00 for the PWS=0 group down to r = 0.71 for Caribou and r = 0.69 for Rank Tracker.
What Does This Mean, Exactly?
I’m glad you asked. Of course, this doesn’t mean that the Rank Tracker and Caribou measures are unreliable. On the contrary, both correlated strongly (r = 0.90) with Google Webmaster Tools (GWT) rankings. What it does suggest is that, given enough keywords, rankings do vary a fair amount depending on how you measure them. There are a couple of general conclusions I think we can draw:
1. PWS=0 Is Unreliable
I’d welcome more data on the subject, but it looks like the "pws=0" parameter does little or nothing for many queries. If you’re using the de-personalization parameter and taking the result at face value, I’d strongly suggest you reconsider. It does appear that turning off personalization may affect some geo-targeted personalization, but the query parameter doesn’t make Google completely ignore your search history.
2. "Logged out" Probably Isn’t
Google’s announcement last year as much as admitted this – if you think being logged out will de-personalize your searches, think again. The open question is: just how much different is it? This data suggests that being logged out has very little impact on rankings, assuming that you’re on the same machine with the same IP. Move to a new machine/IP, and the difference is much more substantial.
3. Second Opinions Are Gold
There really is no gold standard. The rankings in Google Webmaster Tools are the closest we can get to being inside Fort Knox, but these numbers are completely opaque and many SEOs have reported occasional rankings that differ wildly from observed searches. If you rely on rankings as a primary metric, get a second opinion, preferably either a fully logged-out ranking on a browser/IP with no history, or by using a 3rd-party tool like SEOmoz’s Rank Tracker.
4. Skepticism Is Healthy
It always makes sense to check your facts, and search rankings are no different. Rankings vary – you can occasionally type the same query twice in a row and see two different results. Smart SEOs have already diversified, considering metrics like search traffic and conversions. On the other hand, even across these test cases, rankings don’t vary a huge amount. So, don’t panic, but as always, the key is not to put too much trust in any single number.
Posted by randfish
We all work hard at the SEO process – analyzing sites, gathering data, researching potential problems and identifying the solutions. Today’s post is on how to work smarter and faster using bookmarklets for SEO. No matter your browser, these plug-and-play links will let you get your job done faster and easier, and look like a pro in front of bosses and clients.
The list isn’t completely comprehensive, but it covers 95%+ of the SEO data points I retrieve on a monthly basis and a few extras I don’t personally use that may be valuable to others. It also has a section at the end on how to make your own bookmarklets for any site, tool or service you use. To employ, just click and drag the bookmarklet links from this blog post into your sidebar or bookmarks folder and rename to whatever you’d like. I’ve divided the post up into sections so you can quickly grab the items you care about.
SEO Bookmarklets Sections:
- Site Indexation Queries
- Backlink Data Queries
- Specialized Search Queries
- Domain & Traffic Data Queries
- Social Media Data Queries
- How to Construct Your Own Bookmarklets

Just follow the instructions from this highly "meta" image
Site Indexation Queries
- #1 – Google site:rootdomain.com
- Bookmarklet - GG Indexed Pages
- #2 – Yahoo! Site Explorer listing of pages on the root domain
- Bookmarklet – Y!SE Indexed Pages
- #3 – Bing site:rootdomain.com
- Bookmarklet - Bing Indexed Pages
Backlink Data Queries
- #4 – Open Site Explorer (OSE) list of links to current URL
- Bookmarklet – OSE Links to URL
- #5 – OSE list of links to entire domain
- Bookmarklet – OSE Links to Domain
- #6 – OSE list of linking domains to current URL
- Bookmarklet – OSE Linking Domains to URL
- #7 – OSE linking domains to entire domain
- Bookmarklet – OSE Linking Domains to Root
- #8 – OSE anchor text distribution for current URL
- Bookmarklet – OSE URL Anchor Text
- #9 – OSE anchor text distribution for entire domain
- Bookmarklet – OSE Domain Anchor Text
- #10 – Yahoo! Site Explorer (Y!SE) links to current URL
- Bookmarklet – Y!SE Links to URL
- #11 – Y!SE links to entire domain
- Bookmarklet – Y!SE Links to Domain
- #12 – Google Blogsearch links to current URL
- Bookmarklet – GG Bloglinks to URL
- #13 – Bing linkfromdomain for entire domain
- Bookmarklet – Bing LinkfromDomain
- #14 – Historical PageRank for current URL
- Bookmarklet – PR History
Specialized Search Queries
- #15 – Google: Remove personalization
- Bookmarklet – GG -Personalized
- #16 - Google: Include duplicate results
- Bookmarklet – GG +Dups
- #17 – Google: Show results from last 24 hours only
- Bookmarklet – GG 24 Hours
- #18 – Google: Show results from last 7 days only
- Bookmarklet – GG 7 Days
- #19 – Google: Show US results (useful when performing queries from overseas)
- Bookmarklet – GG US SERPs
- #20 – Google "Text-Only" Cache of current URL
- Bookmarklet – GG Text Cache
Domain & Traffic Data Queries
- #21 – Domaintools lookup on current domain
- Bookmarklet – Domaintoools Lookup
- #22 – Compete.com traffic data on current domain
- Bookmarklet – Compete Traffic
- #23 – Quantcast traffic data on current domain
- Bookmarklet – Quantcast Traffic
- #24 – Alexa traffic data on current domain
- Bookmarklet – Alexa Data
- #25 - Wayback Machine archives for curent URL
- Bookmarklet – URL Wayback Archive
- #26 - Google Trends for Websites on the current domain
- Bookmarklet – GG Trends Data
Social Media Data Queries
- #27 – Backtweets Info on current URL
- Bookmarklet – Backtweets for URL
- #28 – Tweetmeme Info on entire domain
- Bookmarklet – Tweetmeme for Domain
- #29 – PostRank Info on entire domain
- Bookmarklet - PostRank for Domain
- #30 – StumbleUpon Info on current URL
- Bookmarklet – StumbleUpon URL Data
How to Construct Your Own Bookmarklets
Here’s a sample code snippet for the bookmarklet above that shows links from OpenSiteExplorer.org:
javascript:location.href='http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/'+location.host+'/a!links'
To reproduce the effect with a bookmarklet that calls data from any site, you’ll need to
- Find a web-based tool that stores the webpage it’s calling data for in the URL. For example, Google Trends for Websites uses a format like "http://trends.google.com/websites?q=site:seomoz.org"
- Include the initial piece – javascript:location.href=’ at the start of the bookmarklet link
- Follow that code snippet with the desired webpage that contains data. For example, if I wanted to get Google Trends for Websites, I’d use http://trends.google.com/websites?q=site%3A – note that for special characters in the URL like the colon : you’ll need to use the hex character codes (a good list is here)
- Next you’ll need to call the current URL. The most common way to do this is with window.location.href or location.host which pulls the URL string from the address bar.
- You may need to strip out portions of the URL to get just the sub or root domain. In my example with Google Trends, I’d use document.domain.replace(‘www.’,”) rather than the full URL string from #4 above. This removes the www from a domain name if it exists and extracts only the domain portion instead of the complete URL.
- To combine the javascript code snippet, you’ll need to use proper syntax – following phrases with +, wrapping in single quotes and ending with a semicolon ;
- The finished code snippet looks like this - javascript:location.href=’http://trends.google.com/websites?q=site%3A’+document.domain.replace(‘www.’,”);
- You can use a wide variety of Javascript commands to build all sorts of bookmarklets, not just those that call URLs or append data. However, you’ll need a more advanced tutorial to show you that process – sorry!
Now you’re ready to start building your own bookmarklets. We’d love to have you share any of your favorites (or any new concoctions) in the comments below. If you’ve got great ones, I’ll even try to add them into the post tomorrow and, naturally, pass on the credit
p.s. One I’d love to see is a bookmarklet that gives a pop-up of the current website’s IP address and, for extra bonus, takes you to a Bing IP: search query to show other sites hosted on that address.
Testing How Crawl Priority Works
02/05/10
Posted by mgalecki
This post was originally in YOUmoz, and was promoted to the main blog because it provides great value and interest to our community. The author’s views are entirely his or her own and may not reflect the views of SEOmoz, Inc.
A SHORT INTRODUCTION…
We all know that the search engine robots more frequently visit popular pages, i.e. those that have the largest number of incoming links, both internal and external ones. The architecture of a website is usually correlated with the popularity of these pages expressed by number of backlinks:
- Home page has the most backlinks,
- 1st (e.g. product categories), 2nd & 3rd level pages obtain less links,
- finally the least important are deep pages (with articles, classified ads, product pages, etc).
The above mentioned “importance” of web pages versus the web site architecture has been illustrated in one of the Rand’s posts titled "Diagrams for Solving Crawl Priority & Indexation Issues":

Important pages tend to have a different priority of indexation, and this was also presented very nicely by Rand:

Purple spots are those with the highest number of external links. As it can be seen, the pages which are close, take some of the popularity and they pass part of it further (pink spots). All the other spots stand for pages that are too far from the entrance points of search engine robots, which means that the chance of their indexation is much smaller.
In case of classified websites, which contain a lot of content, the above diagram should include subsequent category listing or search results pages. They are obviously less important than the main category pages, but their indexing additionally influences the indexation of their components – ad details pages. This is particularly important when the listing starts with so called premium ads, which change less often than standard classifieds.
BEFORE THE TEST…
Having this theoretical information, we have decided to see how it is like in practice. We have analyzed a website of http://www.morusek.pl (with animals and pets related classifieds from Poland) which has a total number of indexed pages exceeding 100,000. Using the combination of "site" and "inurl" queries we checked what is the number of indexed pages with a list of classifieds (in Polish “ogloszenia”): http://www.google.pl/search?q=site%3Awww.morusek.pl+inurl%3A%22%2F0%2F%22+inurl%3Aogloszenia
The initial results were the following:

To continue the analysis, we excluded the first pages, as the numbers here are influenced by existence of some category pages with no classifieds at the moment, but which are indexable (there are crawlable links in the menu). In addition, to verify the effectiveness of the "site" query, we took into account a number of pages reported by Google Webmaster Tools (GWT) under "Internal Links". The results were as follows:
WHAT’S IMPORTANT TO KNOW?
The first conclusion is obviously that the higher the page number is, the less probability that the page will be indexed. Secondly, while the actual numbers of GWT and “site” queries vary a lot, the trends (slopes) are almost the same. On average, the chance that the robot will crawl to the next page of search results decreases by 1,2-1,3% per page.
It is also interesting that, according to Google Webmaster Tools, pages from 2 to 4 have a good indexation ratio which later decreases dramatically at the fifth position. For example, for sites with number 4 the level of indexation is 60%, while for pages number 15 it falls below 30% (according to Google Webmaster Tools), or 40% (for the command “site” in Google). This is due to the fact that Googlebots have a much longer way to reach the appropriate link in case of the latter (a link to page 15 first appears on page 12), while there are direct links to pages 2, 3 and 4 on the first pages of search listings (see below):
![]()
THE SUBJECT OF THE TEST: INTRODUCING MORE LINKS
We decided to test what would be the changes in indexation ratios if we introduced more links to subsequent ad listings pages. On the first page of each category we added links to the 5th, 10th and 15th pages as show on the picture below:
![]()
After a month we tested the changes. Due to inaccurate results returned by the command “site” in Google (number of indexed pages seemed to be greater than the actual number of them) we present data from Google Webmaster Tools (internal links) only:
THE RESULTS
The graph clearly shows us that indexation of pages that were added to the listing on the first page is much higher after the change (pages: 5th, 10th and 15th), and actually equals the indexation of pages 2, 3 and 4.
However, the increase in indexation of pages directly linked from the home page did not affect the indexation of the neighbouring pages. For example, we can see a huge increase for page 10, but there is no change for pages 9 and 11. The conclusion is that for Googlebots these pages are too far from the points of entry. Only category pages for main region have incoming links. To index page 9 of the intersection of categories and regions, the robots would have to go the following path:
- main category page (entry point),
- category page + region (first page of results),
- category page + region (tenth page of results),
- category page + region (page 9 of the results).
What makes it even worse, not all the category pages have incoming links.
THE CONCLUSIONS
For classifieds or e-commerce websites, the conclusion is that the more pages linked in the listing, the greater the chance that they will be indexed. In general, it is clear that the farther from the point of entry (external link), the less chance that the page will be indexed. Therefore, it is advisable not to create sites with a very deep structure and to remember that the pages far from the points of entry should be additionally linked to (for example as "similar products", "see also", "related categories", etc.).
Looking at the chart we can see yet another change – a slight decrease in indexation of pages 2, 3 and 4. This can be either because there are new pages added recently and they have not been indexed yet (when the number of ads in a certain category has started to exceed the space on the first page), or due to increase in the number of outcoming links on the first page. I would rather bet the first explanation, because in fact the new links were added to a small percentage of pages. There are only 400 fifth pages (so the links to fifth pages were placed on 0,5% of all the first pages). Pages 10 and 15 are even less numerous.
Introduction of additional links has not increased the level of indexation of classifieds, however I suppose that the rate of change was simply too small to affect their indexation. Moreover, the indexation of ads of Morusek.pl exceeded already 80% when the experiment started. Such changes can produce a visible increase in the number of indexed pages in case of sites where the rate of change is much higher and the level of indexation of classifieds or products – lower.
A Guest Post by Christie Burnett. Image Source.

Feeling sluggish about blogging in the new year? Being innovative on your blog can be a great way to re-energise yourself. The process of being creative and trying something different can definitely up your blogging fun quota when you are feeling stale and uninspired. Trying something new also has the advantage of showing readers a new side to your blogging persona and this could have the added benefit of engaging a whole new set of followers. And you never know, you might just start a new blogging craze. Let me give you an example.
In November 2009, I published my first “From My Notebook” post. I basically replicated what I had written that day in my own personal journal, presenting it on a graphic notepaper page, and the response from my readers to the format was extremely positive. I had lots of Twitter questions about how I had created it and positive comments left in response to the post. And I enjoyed the process of doing something different. It was fun, challenged my creative processes a little and was a much quicker post to put together than many of my others – no photos to edit, no laboring over what I was writing, no research to include. It was simple, yet effective.
Every now and then throwing in a new style of post keeps every one on their toes. So, here are 20 words to get you thinking about fun ways to step away from your usual style and give readers something fresh.
1. Draw
Put pencil to paper or pen to tablet and say something with illustrations, instead of words.
Check out Miao & Wafupafu for inspiration.
2. Photograph
Set yourself the challenge of telling a story without words, just photographs.
Telling Your Story with Words and Images offers great tips for choosing the right photographs.
3. Share
If your blog is usually full of product reviews or technical information, turn things upside down by sharing a personal story instead. Or tell readers something about you that they never would have guessed.
In Why Stories are an Effective Communication Tool for Your Blog, Darren shares his reasons for why stories engage readers on an emotional level.
4. Measure
Insert a graph, pie chart, table or diagram to make your point.
5. Debate
Invite another blogger, preferably one who usually takes an alternative stance to you, to enter into a debate with you via online chat or Skype and then publish it on your blog.
6. Laugh
Make your readers chuckle – self deprecation, jokes, comic strips – whatever works with your target audience.
7. Watch
Give vlogging a twirl or insert a relevant video from YouTube to get readers talking.
8. Give
Give something back to readers by hosting a giveaway. Or donate $$ to your favourite charity for every comment left on a post.
9. Teach
Make something from scratch, and then create a tutorial to teach others how to do it too.
10. Introduce
Invite a guest blogger to be featured on your blog and introduce readers to someone new.
Try You’ll Never Know Unless You Ask for more information about inviting others to guest post on your blog.
11. List
When was the last time you write a list post? If it has been a while, compile a list which will be useful to readers today.
Check out Ali Hale’s guest post at Problogger, 10 Steps to the Perfect List Post.
12. Resource
Develop a free downloadable resource for your readers.
13. Colour
In colour psychology, blue equates to serenity and calmness whilst red is strong and gutsy, dramatic even. Think about creatively using colour to add intensity to your post or to set the mood for readers.
14. Solve
Do readers email you with questions, problems or dilemmas? Take the opportunity to channel ‘Dear Abbey’ and help them out with some useful advice. I did this recently with, “The Case For Not Packing Away.”
15. Inspire
Source relevant inspirational quotes to share with readers. Or include statistics or new research findings.
16. Ask
Find out more about your readership by asking them to participate in a survey or poll.
Read more about surveys – Survey Your Readers and Discover Who They Are and How You Can Be More Useful to Them.
17. Headline
Use the powers of the internet to source news stories relevant to your niche and readership. Include your personal reaction and thoughts.
18. Re-package
Re-package your post differently – standard content wrapped up in a new look. Present it as a postcard, a journal page, a post-it note, a shopping list, a recipe, or a collage.
Try Super Stickies for a bit of fun.
19. Link
Create a list of great posts, linking to other blogs in your niche. Keep them relevant and your links will be popular with readers. You might even find that you get linked back to in return.
20. Challenge
Develop a challenge for your readers and offer to publish the best submissions you receive. It could be a group writing challenge, an online photography exhibition or any challenge that best suits your niche and target audience.
Keep this list handy and come back to it for inspiration whenever you are feeling stale or depressed about blogging. You are limited only by your imagination and willingness to try something new.
Christie Burnett is a trained early childhood teacher, presenter, writer and, most importantly, Mum. She blogs at Childhood 101 about all the things that contribute to growing a memorable, healthy childhood, with lots of ideas, tips and information for families.
Post from: Blog Tips at ProBlogger.
20 Ways to Up Your Blogging Fun Quota

































.jpg)



